Emerging Charismatics
The latest Barna report is entitled, "Is American Christianity Turning Charismatic?" The report is made up of two different studies showing that "Pentecostal perspectives and practices has grown significantly in the past two decades." While conversations about Pentecostalism tend to bring up images of snake-handling or Elmer-Gantry-inspired televangelists, the reality is that Pentecostal/charismatic doctrines, practices, and spirituality is spreading in the United States. Any discussion of Pentecostalism requires definitions. What exactly is Pentecostal and charismatic? In their research, the Barna group classified a charismatic or Pentecostal as respondents who "have been filled by the Holy Spirit and believe that the charismatic gifts, such as tongues and healing, are valid and active today." Here is what the report revealed: Barna notes that the growth of Pentecostalism in the United States coincides with cultural trends. This includes the emerging generation's lack of interest in the debates of Pentecostal doctrine from the past. Barna notes, "We are moving toward a future in which the charismatic-fundamentalist split will be an historical footnote rather than a dividing line within the body of believers. Young Christians, in particular, have little energy for the arguments that have traditionally separated charismatics and non-charismatics. Increasing numbers of people are recognizing that there are more significant arenas in which to invest their resources." I agree. Doug Banister declared an end to the war between evangelicals and charismatics years ago in his wonderful book, The Word and Power Church (1999). Charismatic doctrines and practices are spreading throughout evangelical churches in the United States. And yet, I find myself redefining my own faith and ministry in ways that seems less charismatic. I first began to wrestle with this in a November 2006 blog. Subsequent to this blog, I declared to my congregation that I had "packed my bags" and left the charismatic movement. The declaration was awkward and a bit over-stated, but "packing my bags" was the only metaphor that seemed to fit. I found it much more honest to define myself as a Trinitarian Christian than a charismatic Christian. As I have reflected for more than a year on the reclassification of my Christian experience, I have come to find that I haven't left Pentecostal/charismatic doctrine as much as I have left a Pentecostal/charismatic subculture. A subculture can be indenified by a number of things, but I would define a Pentecostal/charismatic subculture by the following eight values: anti-intellectual, hyper-emotional, ahistorical, spiritual elitism, selective hermeneutic, pragmatic spirituality, cultural disdain, and over-realized eschatology. Here is a fuller explaination: Values of a Pentecostal/charismatic Subculture Anti-intellectual Hyper-emotional Ahistorical Spiritual-elitism Selective hermeneutic Pragmatic spirituality Cultural disdain Over-realized eschatology Rejecting these values and leaving the charismatic movement does not mean that I have lost any of the charismatic doctrinal distictives that I picked up while I was in the movement. I still pray in tongues (i.e. speak in tongues). I still believe in prophecy. I still lay hands on the sick and pray for miracles of healing. I am just no longer a living in the subculture. I have struggled with vocabulary to describe what this is that I am moving into. It is an emerging charismatic journey of sorts. The emerging church is a conversation of like-minded Christians within evangelicalism. They are asking questions and challenging the assumptions of fundamentalists. I find the language of the emerging church to be helpful in explain what this is that I am moving into…it seems that I am becoming a emerging charismatic.
Charismatics typically do not value an intellectual approach to the faith. Systematic theology and scholastic methods of biblical study are ignored or viewed with suspicion. Rigorous academic training is considered unimportant for ministry training. Reason is not out-right rejected, but it is subordinate to "spiritual revelation."
Charismatic worship typically evokes an emotional response. However within the subculture, emotional reactions become the sign of spirituality. It is assumed that a person's connection to the Holy Spirit is measured emotionally. Frequently charismatic worship services are valued in terms of how the congregation is moved emotionally.
Pentecostal/charismatics have prided themselves for more than 100 years that they are free from the constraints of "traditionalism." They tend to celebrate their own history within the Christian story, but do not lend value to Church history unless it reflects charismatic distinctives. There is little discussion of the creeds or the ecumenical councils.
The ugliest side of the Pentecostal/charismatic subculture is the subtle arrogance that those who are "Spirit-filled" are somehow more advanced in those spiritual journey than those who are not "Spirit-filled" (as defined by charismatics). This value prevents some charismatics from reading books from other Christian traditions or entering into to Christian community with non-charismatics.
Charismatics, like any Christian subculture, have their favorite Scripture verses. A good charismatic has the verses on the Holy Spirit, healing, deliverance, prophecy, spiritual gifts, blessings, and prosperity underlined or highlighted in their Bible. This obsessive highlighting causes them to overlook the verses on suffering, self-sacrifice, contentment, and hardship that are a part of the Christian life.
The Pentecostal/charismatic subculture has a way of discussing life in the Spirit that is subjective, personal, and consumer-driven. The blessings of God (spiritual, physical, or material) are proclaimed for the use of the individual. You can order your own blessings through Christian television or by entering your credit card into any charismatic ministry's website. For any size "love gift" you can receive all sorts of "ministry resources" that will (of course) bless your life.
The Pentecostal/charismatic subculture grew out of holiness revivals. The downside to this holiness background is a disdain for culture. The term "secular culture" is synonymous with "the evils of Satan." Art, beauty, music, etc. must carry with it a Christian label, without which it is simply sinful. Such a disdain for "secular" culture isolates charismatics from the rest of the world, creating a challenge for the missional life of the Church. It also makes charismatics look weird.
This theological extreme includes an over-powering apocalyptic vision, triumphalism, and the like. The essential problem is that many charismatics believe that the end has already come. The power and victory that is waiting for us at the end of the world has come now and thus Christians should live "in complete victory as an overcomer." The truth is that the kingdom has already come and yet is still coming. In other words, we do get to taste moments of "victory," but complete victory will not be secured until Jesus returns. We have not arrived. We have a long way to go.



11 comments:
Great post! It is the subculture...I think that distinction is the difference.
I think the term "emerging" is dying off, or losing some steam, not because the ideas and content of what is being sorted out is having less interest, far from it, but because of the baggage that goes with the emerging/emergent terms. Heresy hunters, misunderstandings, etc.
Really, why would I want to get in a silly argument from someone (who may not understand the issues involved) when I say "emerging", when I can just discuss...say...the differences between an attractional model church and a missional model?
Cheers.
PS I got a new post about prophecy. I was getting some feedback from BZ about it, and just wondering what you thought?
Yeah it seems that "emerging" may be a passing fad, but it is helpful in describing what this is that I am in on my spiritual journey.
It is a sort of post-charismatic stage for me. I like the language of "conversation" in emerging church dialogs. That is what I am doing...questioning the assumptions and values of the P/c subculture. It is jumping on Rob Bell's theological trampoline.
I am not trying to be a part of the latest evangelical fad. I am just trying to explain where I am on my spiritual journey.
Derek
PS I will check out your post on prophecy...
Excellent!
Anti-Intellectual
Hyper-emotional
Ahistorical
Spiritual-elitism
Selective hermeneutic
Pragmatic spirituality
Cultural disdain
Over-realized eschatology
A very good summary of why I had to move on.
Anti-intellectual. More than anything else this is what forced me to pack my bags. As Dylan said in "Chronicles", you have to lose your passion for dumbness. The Pentecostal/Charismatic movements just exaggerated a negative trend that was already present in American evangelicalism. Evangelical forerunners like Wesley and Edwards were anything but anti-intellectual -- both of them employed intellectual brilliance in their revivalist labors.
Hyper-emotional. The reintroduction of emotion into the uptight, Enlightenment influenced church was a good thing. Let's just make sure we don't end up with the tail wagging the dog.
Ahistorical. Eclectic as the third of my "Five Words" has much to do with realizing we have a 2,000 year history -- not a 100 year history. I need Augustine, Aquinas, Assisi.
Spiritual elitism. God forgive me.
Selective hermeneutic. I said years ago, the Word of Faith movement doesn't have a Bible, is has a pamphlet.
Pragmatic spirituality. We need a revival of Christian mysticism (defined as the philosophy and practice of a direct experience with God). If someone says that Christian mysticism is dangerous, I tell them, not as dangerous as Christian pragmatism. MYSTERY!!
Cultural disdain. We need to join the human race. We find common ground in our common humanity. Good art needs no further justification than it is good art.
Over-realized eschatology. For me, the Charismatic movement has been Left Behind.
So I've packed my bags. I packed my bags because there are good things worth keeping. But the Charismatic movement must be a contribution, not a totality.
Anyway, good thinking, Derek.
Enjoy the journey.
BZ
your list left me feeling embarrassed...but now happy to admit i was embarrassed and glad i don't have to be anymore....
hey i have a nice leather bound charismatic concordance which only lists the verses "we" are likely to need. it's quite a bit smaller than the old exhaustive type....i'll sell it to you cheap!
A good read for me, a Christian with a Calvinist background now attending a pentacostal church...I was nodding my head in agreement all the way through -- but I love these people here and the our church community, and as long as this is on the periphery what can be considered the salvation issues, looks like I may be here awhile!
BZ & PZ -- Welcome to the comment line!
Brian, thanks for the commentary. I like the” WOF pamphlet” comment. They don’t have a Bible, they have a pamphlet…HA! Your “five words” – cross, mystery, eclectic community, and revolution – are each pathways in leaving the P/c subculture.
My exodus was not something I wanted to do. It was something I had to do. It was my “Maggie’s Farm.”
I ain't gonna work on Maggie's farm no more.
No, I ain't gonna work on Maggie's farm no more.
Well, I try my best
To be just like I am,
But everybody wants you
To be just like them.
They sing while you slave and I just get bored.
I ain't gonna work on Maggie's farm no more.
Peri, I am always looking for a good book deal. My favorite charismatic book purchase was 101 Reasons Why Christ Returns in 1988. I bought it for 50 cents in 1996!
Derek
Derek,
Just a quick comment here -- I believe these eight points could describe almost every denomination and sect of Christianity in one way or another.
Anti-Intellectual - most would not want their adherents questioning their most adhered too doctrines -- and while each having their "scholars", they would not promote scholarly thinking among believers per se'.
Hyper-emotional - while this one is more exclusively Pentecostal/charismatic -- I beleive the seeker-sensitive model is rapidly changing that.
Ahistorical - almost all (with the exception of Calvinists and Catholics) reject church history as of viable importance. Most keep to only their denominational history and miss out on so much.
Spiritual-elitism - which denomination/sect doesn't believe they are the best? (I would suppose that anyone belonging to a particular group of believers would do so b/c they believed them to be the best).
Selective hermeneutic - thus, we have doctrinal papers -- once again -- with each having their own specialized denominational (or "non") emphasis.
Pragmatic spirituality - a truth that has always been the case in the church -- even in our efforts to back off we becoe pragmatic in our spirituality -- therefore we blog...
Cultural disdain - a problem of the church at large since almost the very beginning...
Over-realized eschatology - I hear what you're saying here - but not exclusively a Pentecostal/charismatic problem. I would interject -- eschatology (what I think on the end of things) is a biblical concept (however one may be slanted in their thinking) -- and that "over realized" is somewhat of an "over-relative" statement.
Very interesting "conversation" -- thanks for the post -- may God bless.
p.s. went a little longer than expected - sorry.
Shane,
You know I think you are right. I can only talk about my "tribe" from real experience, but if I am looking from the outside in -- I think you are right. It does seem that MANY evangelical denominations can adopt these subculture-ish traits.
I haven't read Mark Noll's Scandal of the Evangelical Mind, but I think I heard people saying that he may be hinting at the same thing.
These may be sub-culture expressions throughout evangelicalism. The P/c movement is just one expression of that ism.
Good thoughts!
Derek
This was an excellent post.
I found your post while googling "Over realized eschatology" for a message in am preparing for this weekend. Great stuff! I am a pastor with the Assemblies of God, and I wrestle with many of these issues.
I consider myself a Christian first and foremost -- and find myself embarrassed by many of the excesses of "Pentecost".
Thanks for what you are doing in your blog and your church! I will be back!
Brent -- Oak Harbor WA
Post a Comment